Getting Started
Village API vs In-house
Start syncing your usersβ networks in less than a week.
Hereβs a detailed comparison of how Village outperforms building in-house:
Criteria | Village API π | In-House π οΈ | Details |
---|---|---|---|
Speed | |||
Build & GTM speed | β 1 week | β 18 months | Save time with pre-built API components for most use-cases. |
Costs | |||
Build cost | β $5/user/month | β $1.5M+ | You only need a part-time engineer vs a full team of 8 engineers, PM and designers. |
Maintainenance & reliability | β Included | β Distracting | Guaranteed reliability and zero ongoing burden to keep services active |
Data acquisition & cleaning | β Included | β Expensive | Save $200k+ per year acquiring, cleaning and mapping public data relationships |
Server | β Included | β $2k+/month | Village eliminates the need for dedicated server expenses for graph operations |
Impact | |||
Relationship intelligence | β 10+ data sources | β 3 (at best) | Village integrates across 10+ sources vs. limited in-house capabilities. |
User friction | β Minimal | β High | Pull, analyze then utilize userβs private and public data in seconds |
Village network | β 30+ partners, largest grid | β None | Larger pool of connected accounts, means better identity matching and wider reach through other Village network users. |
Strategic | |||
Competitive advantage | β 10x faster | β Yes | Both provide an edge, but Village achieves it faster and at scale. |
Network moat | β Enterprise only | β Yes | Opt-out from the global network grid and host your own private graph |
Overall ROI | β High | β Low | Village offers fast time-to-value at a lower entry barrier, helping you save costs and achieve highest impact. |
Why Village API Stands Out
-
Seamless Integration: Ready-to-use network graph in just 1 week.
-
Largest Relationship Grid: Gain access to a 30+ partner reverse lookup network.
-
Cost-Effective Scalability: Avoid the $1.5M+ engineering expense of in-house development.