Here’s a detailed comparison of how Village outperforms building in-house:

CriteriaVillage API πŸ†In-House πŸ› οΈDetails


Speed
Build & GTM speedβœ… 1 week❌ 18 monthsSave time with pre-built API components for most use-cases.

Costs
Build costβœ… $5/user/month❌ $1.5M+You only need a part-time engineer vs a full team of 8 engineers, PM and designers.
Maintainenance & reliabilityβœ… Included❌ DistractingGuaranteed reliability and zero ongoing burden to keep services active
Data acquisition & cleaningβœ… Included❌ ExpensiveSave $200k+ per year acquiring, cleaning and mapping public data relationships
Serverβœ… Included❌ $2k+/monthVillage eliminates the need for dedicated server expenses for graph operations

Impact
Relationship intelligenceβœ… 10+ data sources❌ 3 (at best)Village integrates across 10+ sources vs. limited in-house capabilities.
User frictionβœ… Minimal❌ HighPull, analyze then utilize user’s private and public data in seconds
Village networkβœ… 30+ partners, largest grid❌ NoneLarger pool of connected accounts, means better identity matching and wider reach through other Village network users.

Strategic
Competitive advantageβœ… 10x fasterβœ… YesBoth provide an edge, but Village achieves it faster and at scale.
Network moatβœ… Enterprise onlyβœ… YesOpt-out from the global network grid and host your own private graph


Overall ROI
βœ… High❌ LowVillage offers fast time-to-value at a lower entry barrier, helping you save costs and achieve highest impact.

Why Village API Stands Out

  • Seamless Integration: Ready-to-use network graph in just 1 week.

  • Largest Relationship Grid: Gain access to a 30+ partner reverse lookup network.

  • Cost-Effective Scalability: Avoid the $1.5M+ engineering expense of in-house development.